"We found that, faced with a choice between two low-scoring products, one with many reviews and one with few, the statistics say we should actually go for the product with few reviews, since theres more of a chance its not really so bad," he said.In one online experiment, 132 adult participants looked at a series of phone cases, presented in pairs. The findings, published in the journal PsychologicalScience, indicate that people tend to favor a product that has more reviews, even when it has the same low rating as an alternative product.

A second online experiment that followed the same design and procedure produced similar results. Researchers wanted to see how people would actually use review and rating information when choosing a product.Do you often check user ratings before buying products online? You may be misled into making the wrong choice, a study suggests."Its extremely common for websites and apps to display the average score of a product along with the number of reviews," said Derek Powell of Stanford University.Across various combinations of average rating and number of reviews, participants routinely chose the option with more reviews."We wanted to examine how people use this wealth of information when they make decisions and how they weigh information about other peoples decisions with information about the outcomes of those decisions," said Powell."By examining a large dataset of reviews from China Smart Pet Fountain Factory Amazon."But participants in our studies did just the opposite: They went for the more popular product, despite the fact that they shouldve been even more certain it was of low quality," he added.In other words, real-world data show that a large number of reviews is not a reliable indicator of a products quality.However, scientists suggest that people tend to use this information in ways that can work to their disadvantage.The researchers found that this pattern of results fit closely with a statistical model based on social inference.com, researchers found no relationship between the number of reviews a product had and its average rating.com, we were able to build a statistical model of how people should choose products," said Powell."We found that people were biased toward choosing to purchase more popular products and that this sometimes led them to make very poor decisions," Powell said.

This bias was so strong that they often favoured the more-reviewed phone case even when both of the options had low ratings, effectively choosing the product that was, in statistical terms, more likely to be low quality. When buying products online, people often rely on the ratings and reviews of others to choose. That is, people seem to use the number of reviews as shorthand for a products popularity, independent of the products average rating.. The participants saw an average user rating and total number of reviews for each phone case and indicated which case in each pair they would buy.Looking at actual products available on Amazon.As opportunities to buy products and services online multiply, we have greater access than ever before to huge amounts of first-hand information about users experiences.

"Or if there’s only one dog, a court may do like, ‘OK, you get the dog a month at a time, a week at a time," said family law attorney Atousa Saei.Quirk himself has a Maltese-ShihTzu mix named Luna and calls himself "the proud parent of a rescued dog."He found an ally in California’s pet-loving governor, who has a photo of "first dog" Lucy Brown on his website. They finally worked out an agreement just ahead of trial. I personally have a little rescue bichon poodle named Rodney King Stone. He’s like a family member," said family law attorney Megan Green of Los Angeles, who has seen her share of divorce cases where couples battled relentlessly over the pet. "When she is not out exploring the family ranch in Colusa County with the governor and first lady, Lucy can be found guarding the office and herding staff at the state Capitol," according to her bio.

In one case, a woman said the dog was a gift from her husband, but the husband maintained he was the one who took care of it.Some judges have put the dog between the would-be owners and tried to determine who it liked the best.Without the law that goes into effect on January 1, attorneys say judges have often had to get creative in reaching agreements when both sides say they can’t bear to part with their pet.Assemblyman Bill Quirk, a Hayward Democrat who introduced the law, said it’s time family pets got the status they deserve — family members.Under a bill signed Thursday by Governor Jerry Brown, pets will still be considered community property but a judge deciding China Pet water fountain Factory who gets to keep them will have the discretion of weighing such factors as who feeds them, who takes them to the vet and on walks, and who protects them.

If a family had two pets, a judge would sometimes suggest splitting them up."I think it’s a good idea.Until now, Fido and Kitty have been considered family property, a status giving them little more standing in a divorce than a family’s big-screen TV.Los Angeles: California courts could be going to the dogs — and maybe cats, too — under a new law granting judges authority to settle diغير مجاز مي باشدreements over who keeps the family pet in divorce cases the same way they handle child-custody disputes.

The Trump family does not have a history of keeping animals around the house and there is not any indication, at least, not yet.George W Bush had a Scottish terrier named Barney Bush, the Clintons had a Labrador retriever named Buddy and a cat named Socks, while Americas 27th president, William Howard Taft, had a milk cow.A White House without a four-legged friend would be a rarity, says Dave Baker, the co-owner of the museum.With Trumps inauguration on January 20, many are left wondering if his family will have a pet residing with them at the White House.Throughout history, Americas first families often had pets in their families.Washington: Donald Trump might be the first US President in 150 years to not have a pet in the White House after a plan to have him adopt a golden doodle dog fell through."You can teach children and adults about the presidents of the US through the pets easier than you can through anything else," McLean was quoted as saying by CBS news.

The museum displayed statues, books, vintage pictures, and artifacts such as a bell that was said to belong to former William Tafts milk cow. But as the Obama family prepares to leave the White House at the end of January, so will the fluffy tenants.President Barack Obamas fluffy family dogs Bo and Sunny have stolen Americans hearts. First families with pets make people feel like theyre just like us," said Claire McLean, founder of thePresidential Pet Museum, a donation-based institution not affiliated with the White House or the federal government. If not, he could be the first president in 150 China Smart pet product Suppliers years without a pet."This is a very significant time in presidential pet history.